This entry was posted on August 20, 2012 at 10:30 am and is filed under Science with tags atheism, bat, complexity, creation science, creationism, creationist fruitbat, darwin, evolution, fallacy, fruit bat, fruitbat, intelligent design, intelligent designer, osbert, osbert the creationist fruitbat, tautology, watchmaker, watchmaker fallacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
August 20, 2012 at 11:55 pm
Clever, giving Osbert vestigial teats . . . explain THAT, Intelligent Design Advocates!
August 21, 2012 at 12:49 am
Alas, the ID people typically say that a bat itself is proof of an Intelligent Designer, since there never could have been such thing as a “half-flying mouse.” (The old “Half a Wing” argument: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB921_2.html )